top of page

C.N.P Poetry 

Writer's pictureCathexis Northwest Press

Pressing Flowers; The Importance of the Primary . . .; I Woke to Irises Blooming

By: Mackenzie Schubert


Pressing Flowers


All things become richer in rainfall. The forest’s arms, my lover’s eyes,

my grandmother’s grief. Is pressing flowers


practice in preservation or crucifixion? For a flower

is often pentamerous like a body––such as the forget-me-not, such as my grandmother,

who is also without moisture and light, flattened into the parchment of my life.

On her behalf, when she is gone, I will eat the apricot over other choice fruit,

and look to the cardinal when I enter the garden.




The Importance of the Primary, Based on Qualia and Axioms



i. Red


The origin of almost everything

alive is deeply red.

Every one of our stories began with a great blooming

of genitalia and the blush of a mother’s exhaustion.

Every day that rose in

the past began with a ruby

in the sky. Red-breasted birds sing

of lovers that shape shared lives

from the warm and wet ocherous clay of hellos. Her hands

once tinkered my tiny heart whole [with her miscellaneous things]

and continuously thumping, for she knew this red work would never be

over. The rainbow’s highest part.


ii. Yellow


Such as the sun, which is a brightness sour to the eyes

as a lemon is to the mouth. In summer,

the earliest and last notes of birdsong sail

the wind like ships of yellow sound

waves, breaking at the shores of children’s skulls

as they play in the yard. The mother pats her hands

on an apron yellowed by time. Yellow potato peels

bask in the sunbeams of wide-open windows.

When the mother says: supper! and the children go

running in––to the simple pleasure of being

in the place where one

truly belongs.


iii. Blue


That which is breathed or blown from me,

sold to the gentleman with the belligerent

rainclouds. On days of departures,

I feel as if I have pricked my fingers with

blue thistles. I leave behind

people, places, memories, and weep. Salt

broth of the sea, constantly churning. The bluest songs

of warplanes overhead and the whistles of loose bombs, the burst

heard for hundreds of miles. Silence,

like when observing a lake drained, revealing the graveyard of what once was

a highbush blueberry orchard. At last,

oval-shaped tears I shed when she welcomed me, Home.




I Woke to Irises Blooming


i. Last night, pressing purple hyacinth


into my hands, I cried for all lost

correspondences. Closed my eyes on the hot, intermittent

cinders of any meaning, and in my dreams, chased

the very tiny, quick feet

of my afterwit in

overlapping circles and other worse intricacies until

the impressions had vanished and I was no longer

aware of myself or sure of my reasoning.


ii. In the early morning, I woke to irises


blooming from my irises, divulgences floating out

from their sophisticated centers:

The roof does not implore

the rain to wash off what has grown over.

You must become to become to become

unbound. I went shoeless into the morning,

wet black soil accumulating

at my ankles,

my calves, one hundred loosened strands

of grass, slow garden snails, clinging.


I remember I was something once, before

all of this consumption. At the river,

I saw straw-fish and cigarette-frogs.

Something else, something big and invisible folded

my paper body. A crane pierced the apricot sky.

iii. At the afternoon of all things, I blew life


from a white dandelion to spark more life.

Told the man I love to stay

cautious and close,

should my shadow become me.

When I raised my thought-children up from the ground

of myself, I [with sap and honey] willfully

soothed my own chords of their thunder, and imparted this:

all of us have a cardinal heart––the most vivid immortal

object [insect? dream? machine?

what is a heart anyway?] amidst all this snow.

Do not allow this world to so cruelly turn

your cardinal into a cathedral.




 

Mackenzie Schubert is a recent graduate of William Paterson University in New Jersey, where she was an honor student of writing, psychology, and foreign language. She is presently job hunting, applying for graduate programs, and trying to find her way home.

Interview with the Poet:

Cathexis Northwest Press: How long have you been writing poetry?

Mackenzie Schubert:

I have always been writing––instinctively, vitally––but I would say that I truly resigned myself to poetry (not looking back) very early in my undergraduate years.  CNP: Can you remember the first poem you read that made you fall in love with poetry?

MS:

I knew I would end up a poet after I read “Annabel Lee” by Edgar Allan Poe in grade seven, and then, like dominos––“After great pain, a formal feeling comes” (372) by Emily Dickinson, and “Saturn” by Sharon Olds. I knew my adult life would be spent making poems in the shadows of these. CNP: Who are your favorite poets? Any specific poems?

MS:

Emily Dickinson is my favorite modern poet. Of contemporary poets, I would especially note: Lucie Brock Broido (master of my little writer heart), Sharon Olds, Karen Volkman, and Eric Pankey. But there are many, many other names worth mentioning. 

Favorite poems? Anything by Lucie––“Infinite Riches in the Smallest Rooms”, “The Halo That Would Not Light”, “A Lion in Winter”, “Birdie Africa”, anything. They stay with me. Lately, I have been extremely taken with “Galway Aria” and “Where Is My Lady?” by Sharon Olds. “Singer”, “Sylt I”, and “Sylt II” by Valzhyna Mort. CNP: Can you share for us a little bit about your writing process? Any specific rituals that get you in the zone?

MS:

Rare days, I sit myself down, I start a poem, and I do not stop. I go into something like a state of writerly fugue. I feel as if I actually enter the poem. It is like a fever dream. And next thing I know, it is dark out. Other days, writing is a chore, but one that must be done. I read and research for inspiration, I walk the arboretum near my house. I zero in on a word, obsess over it, and let that word encourage a poem. 

Regarding ritual, I would say: windows. I have to be near a window when I write, always. Maybe because writing is such a reclusive act, one that requires so much introspection, that I end up spending most of my time within myself, and I have to remind myself, at least in some small way, that the world is still out there, moving, and I still have to be in it. 

Or maybe just because I love the birds.

CNP: How do you decide the form for your poems? Do you start writing with a form in mind, or do you let the poem tell you what it will look like as you go?

MS:

The poem decides. I have authority over enjambment/thoughtful line breaking. I have authority over making a single word do, on page, what the meaning of the word is (e.g., forcing the word “fall’ to actually fall to the subsequent line). But when it comes to the skeleton of the poem––the whole ensemble of words rather than lines as parts––the poem instructs its own movement.

CNP: Any advice for poets who have yet to find their voice?

MS:

I think I just recently identified the beginnings of my true voice. These poems published by CNP, while very dear to me, are earlier poems of mine, and do not necessarily reflect the voice that I have recently sharpened to something resembling a point. Just now, after having graduated with a B.A. and having applied to graduate programs for two rounds straight, do I think I have somewhat acquired “my voice”. And who knows? I think a shift in this voice will likely occur. I was just accepted at my dream MFA program. I am hoping these next two years spent in the program will truly make clear my voice. 

Advice? Just keep reading. Just keep writing. Experiment a lot, especially at first. Try on different voices of poets whose work you like, understand their registers. Pick certain tones or qualities of that voice that you would like to keep for yourself, and then move on. Accumulate techniques and styles, essentially. And I think after all of that practice, after all of that time spent messing around with your craft and emulating the poetic algorithms of those whose work you worship, you will find a unique algorithm that is right for you. But never lose sight of that little literary torch that was with you from the beginning, which will, I think, always tell you what writing you ought to be doing.   CNP: What is your editing process like?

MS:

Sometimes a poem might go through four or five drafts until I feel it is finished. In this version, I think of editing like whetting. Each line is a knife. Other times, a poem might only go through one draft. In this version, editing is like a very familiar arrival. Like enlightenment. 

CNP: When do you know that a poem is finished? 

MS:

Endings, now, are intuitive for me. It was not always this way. I really had to work at concluding a piece. Now, the poem will sort of let off a chime when it is done. I listen for that.

Comments


bottom of page